Stephanie Baker is an Odious Liar

Background History:

Stephanie Baker was my criminal defence lawyer from July, 2010 until
May 27, 2011. I met Stephanie Baker for the first time on August 3, 2010
at her office located at 7-284 Cedar Street in Sudbury Ontario.

I brought her a written statement indicating what happened when I got arrested on July 3, 2010. When two Police officers of the Sudbury Regional Police Services violated my Charter Rights.

The Police officers actually tried to use illegally obtained evidence
to procure a search warrant and got busted in doing so.

This is now Case Law.

On that same day, I also gave Stephanie Baker a letter that indicated that
I wanted a Jury trial while citing the numerous conflicts of interest and
bias in Sudbury with Crown Attorneys, Judiciary, etc. All of which I fully
explained to her. If you've read some of the web pages in this website you'll know a fair trial for me in Sudbury is basically an illusion.

For some reason Stephanie Baker's face dropped when I mentioned
all of this. You'll understand later on why her face dropped when I
was talking to about the conflicts of interests with the Crown especially.

Stephanie Baker then indicated to me that I had lots of time as to
my choice of election. Whether it be by Judge alone or by Judge
and Jury.

Eventually there was a preliminary hearing that took 3 days to complete. Those dates were of October 14, November 4 and December 17 all in the
year 2010.

As time wore on, I got a very strong feeling that I was being misled and
lied to by Stephanie Baker. So I sent her a registered letter and asked to
see the Crown Disclosure on May 18, 2011.

As it is my right under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to see the Crown Disclosure so that I can mount a Full Answer
and Full Defence.

Right to Make Full Answer and Defence

Stephanie Baker withdrew from service on May 27, 2011 and I had to get
the Crown disclosure from the Crown office. This led to me filing a complaint against her to the Law Society of Upper Canada on May 30, 2011.

With the Crown disclosure finally in my hands for viewing. I finally had the
proof that I need to have the charges withdrawn. I presented these facts to a better lawyer who did just that by way of a Charter Motion.

Stephanie Baker's incomptence was most taxing and I was really glad to finally have Justice prevail because a better lawyer than her followed my instructions to the letter. In which the illegally obtained evidence was finally excluded. Because of what Cst. Paul Rintala and Cst. Mark Kovala from the Sudbury Regional Police Services did to me on July 3, 2010.

To any of you who have lawyers. If your lawyer doesn't want you to read
the Crown disclosure. That should be your 1st hint that maybe your being
sold down the river. It's your constitutional right to see the Crown disclosure as I provided the link to that right above.

Now you will see what happens when you complain about a lawyer
and the lies they spread about you. Enjoy reading the facts.

Also as shocking as it may all seem in the end. Do know that it is all documented and can be proved in the original unedited form should
the need arise.

You may think that by using the Lawyer and Paralegal Directory link of the
Law Society of Upper Canada below and searching for Stephanie Baker of
Sudbury, Ontario that she has a perfect record and never messed up or did
anything wrong to any her clients. By the time you read this complete web page. You'll shall know otherwise.

Search Lawyer and Paralegal Directory

This image below is what you would see if you searched the link above.
Minus the red circle.

The following image comes from a scan of letter that Stephanie Baker
sent me on January 21, 2011. In which you can plainly see circled in red
that Stephanie Baker mentions that I have an option for a jury trial should
I want one. Mind you, she also mentions that she doesn't want to do one afterwards.

What Stephanie Baker messed up on is the fact that the preliminary
hearing ended on December 17, 2011. Which was 36 days before she
sent this letter. The law is clear that my option to elect a trial mode
ends 15 days after the completion of any preliminary hearing.

In other words, there is no way I had the option to elect a jury trial
since that opportunity sailed out the window. As seen here in the
Section 561 of the Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46) under the
Right to re-elect.

Stephanie Baker never wanted to do a jury trial. But I did.

Regardless, it was my option and not hers.

The following image comes from a scan of letter that Stephanie Baker
sent me on February 10, 2011. In which you can plainly read circled in
green that Justice Riopelle will allow evidence obtained via the Police
Charter breaches to be used against me.

Even if it's proven that the Police did violate my Charter Rights. It's
no wonder I indicated all along that I wanted a Jury trial. Some people
working the Sudbury legal system make their own rules and do ignore Constitutional Law. The Canadian Charter which is entrenched in the Canadian Constitution is the Supreme Law of Canada in case you didn't know. In my view, to ignore Constitutional Law is to ridicule the entire
Justice System.

The following image comes from a scan of letter that the Law Society of
Upper Canada sent me on December 6, 2011. In which, you can plainly
see circled in red that Stephanie Baker was served :

Best Practices for Lawyers

for failing to serve me by Kelly Hart of the Complaints Resolution Department of the Law Society of Upper Canada.

BTW: Isn't odd that it doesn't mention anything on the Law Society
           of Upper Canada Lawyer and Paralegal Directory web page
           with Stephanie Baker's name under discipline history?

Which I posted as the first picture on this web page for your viewing convenience and provided the link for. How misleading of Law Society
of Upper Canada I say. Maybe, they wanted to keep it a secret or
something?

Too late. You know better now.

This is another page of that same decision where it shows circled in red Stephanie Baker messed up and why. In green section below. You can read where I sent her a registered letter on May 18, 2011 and then a week later Stephanie Baker withdrew from service before I even got to see the Crown disclosure. How very nice of her I tell you all.

Say what you want. But a lawyer that gets mad because you want to view
the Crown disclosure and bails out on you. Isn't much of a lawyer to me.

Need I remind you all that once I got the Crown disclosure and I read it
for myself for the first time. The Police statements in it proved that they
violated my Charter rights. Which I used to prove to my new lawyer what happened. With the charges being thus withdrawn in the end in a Charter Motion on February 6, 2012.

No stupid plea bargains were involved either. Unlike what Stephanie Baker wanted me to enter as noted in the letter above dated February 10, 2011.

The following image comes from a scan of letter that Stephanie Baker sent
to the Law Society of Upper Canada on August 18, 2011. You can notice at
the bottom that she mentions I threatened bank employees and said I would shoot myself.

Which is total lie.

Never at any time did I even mention bank employees or hurting any in
any emails to the bank and nowhere did I ever mention shooting myself.
As a matter of fact in the preliminary hearings, Stephanie Baker got
Cst. Paul Rintala to even admit not once, but twice that firearms were
never mentioned.

So she totally discredits herself with another lie. You'll see proof of this
below for yourself in a few scans of the actual preliminary hearings near
the bottom of this web page.

Below is another scanned page from the same letter that Stephanie Baker
sent to the Law Society of Upper Canada on August 18, 2011. Where she
goes on again with this fictitious telephone threat lie made to her by me
via a telephone.

BTW: If any of you speak to Stephanie Baker and can get this fictious
           telephone threat message. I'll give lots of money. Good luck!

Hint: Stephanie Baker is a liar and still hasn't to this day produced it
          to anyone. Which is odd considering, you would think a lawyer
          who deals with evidence on a ongoing basis would be able to at
          least produce evidence from her very own telephone machine.

Stephanie Baker's incompetence is most taxing.

Upon reading this entire letter, I did request the Law Society of Upper
Canada to attempt a obtain copy of this so called fictious threatening telephone message. They couldn't get a copy. Nor provide me with one.

Below is another scanned page from the same letter that Stephanie Baker
sent to the Law Society of Upper Canada on August 18, 2011. Where she
goes on again with this fictitious telephone threat lie made to her by me
via a telephone.

Then Stephanie Baker mentions there was a breakdown.

That came from her knowing that I wanted the Crown disclosure
and didn't trust her incompetence anymore.

Also circled in red is more lies where Stephanie Baker mentions that I
threw a piece of paper at a member of her staff at her office and some
outlandish and ludicrous Courthouse antics.

Again I find it odd, how the Police were never called about any of this?
Don't you people think that such Courthouse antics wouldn't make the
news? Like anyone yelling in a Courtouse wouldn't get you arrested.

Especially, since I was also on bail conditions at the time
when these wild allegations were made by Stephanie Baker.

I suspect this would have made the news don't you agree?

Hint: I never got questioned or charged for anything she ever said
          because it never happened. Didn't I already mention that
          Stephanie Baker is an odious liar yet?

As for what is circled in red at the bottom where Stephanie Baker
mentions:

"We agreed to proceed by Judge alone".

She lied about that as well. Otherwise, why would Stephanie Baker ever mention in her letter dated of January 21, 2011 that I had an option for
a jury? If I agreed to do just Judge alone?

You can see that in the second image on this web page.

This is another page from the same letter that Stephanie Baker sent to
the Law Society of Upper Canada on August 18, 2011 where circled in
red is more lies where Stephanie Baker says that on March 2011 was the
1st time I told her I wanted a jury trial. I asked her on August 3, 2010.

BTW: Why would Stephanie Baker a have mentioned jury trial in that
            letter above dated January 21, 2011 if I never asked her before
            that I wanted a jury trial in the first place? Stephanie Baker
            even said in that letter that she didn't want to do a jury trial.

Somebody else must have instilled that idea to her.

Hint: I told her I wanted a jury trial all along.

Below is another scanned page from the same letter that Stephanie Baker
sent to the Law Society of Upper Canada on August 18, 2011. Where she
goes on again with this fictitious telephone threat lie made to her by me
via a telephone.

So after all the fictitious lies made by Stephanie Baker about me.

I can honestly say that I don't feel bad about telling her to "FUCK OFF" !

It was well deserved and I would do do it again.

This is another page from the same letter that Stephanie Baker sent to the Law Society of Upper Canada on August 18, 2011. Where now Stephanie Baker accuses me of saying that she worked for the Crown.

Stephanie Baker is clearly dillusional. She doesn't work for the Crown.
She's actually married to the Crown. Her husband is Federal Crown Prosecutor, Denys Bradley of Sudbury, Ontario.

I wonder how many of you knew this? Now, why would 2 lawyers who
are husband and wife work both as defence and prosecution in the same
city be using different last names. One can ponder on that.

Again Stephanie Baker, goes off with the threat lies. My reward still
stands if anyone can get me that threatening telephone message.

You'll most likely have better chance finding Jimmy Hoffa alive.

The following 4 scanned images come from a preliminary hearing where
Stephanie Baker cross examined Cst. Paul Rintala and got him to admit.
Not once but twice, that there was never at any time a gun mentioned.

Yet, if you remember 6 images above that on August 18, 2011 Stephanie
Baker told the Law Society of Upper Canada that was I going to hurt the
bank employees and shoot myself. Meanwhile no gun or firearm was ever
even mentioned.

Even the now retired Cst. Paul Rintala admitted back then that
there was no mention of firearms ever when she examined on him.

This is more proof that Stephanie Baker is an liar. As she contradicts
the very evidence that she even help create in Court. While lying to the
Law Society of Upper Canada regarding it.

It doesn't end there. Since I filed a complaint against her. Stephanie Baker even went out her way to lie to Sudbury Regional Police Services about me with some of the same lies mentioned above in 2012.

Below are scans of some of Cst. John Lalonde statement of May 4, 2012. Where Cst. Lalonde says he spoke with Stephanie Baker where she lied
about me.

1. Stephanie Baker indicated to the Police that she saw me numerous
    of times at the Courthouse when I didn't have Court dates and no
    reason to be there.

To this I reply:

a) Stephanie Baker not my lawyer.

b) The World doesn't revolve around Stephanie Baker.

c) You don't need a Court date to be able to go to any Courthouse
     as they are open to the public.

Public Access

Public hearings

135. (1) Subject to subsection (2) and rules of court, all court hearings
shall be open to the public. Public hearings

d) How would she know I didn't have a court date or cared?

2. Stephanie Baker goes off about the yelling again and even goes as far
    to lie to the Police by stating that she was forced to stay inside a
    Courtroom with other lawyers because of me.

What is she implying? That I held the Courthouse hostage or something?

As a matter of fact Toffolli represented me for one day on April 11 2012
in bail court for a simple remand. I'm sure he woudn't have helped me if anything Stephanie Baker said was true about holding him, the rest of the Court staff and Stephanie Baker hostage. Do you? She a freaking nutbar.

3. Stephanie Baker then goes off to mention the Charter hearing of
    February 6th, 2012. Were another lawyer helped me upstairs in
    a small courtroom where only parties involved in the hearing were
    present. The public, nor any other lawyers being present either.

    Stephanie Baker was never present at any time during this hearing.

Question:

    If a laywer stops being your lawyer for whatever reason.
    Should they not leave you alone and not care about you?

I guess Stephanie Baker was more than just a little upset with
my complaint about her to the Law Society of Upper Canada.

This all sounds like harassment to me and the Sudbury Police
Services have condoned it.

I actually sent an email to Crown Attorney Susan Stothart on February 3, 2012. In which, I indicated what Stephanie Baker was saying about me to
the Sudbury Police and Law Society of Upper Canada. While mentioning
that Stephanie Baker was accusing me of committing crimes in hopes that somehow Susan Stothart would intervene. You would think that a Crown Attorney would apply the law.

Nope, Susan Stothart ignored that email and now I don't actually feel bad
that Susan Stothart is being sued by yours truly for getting also personally involved in my other legal matters as in pertains to an illegal arrest on
April 10, 2012. Where I was among other things arbitrarily arrested and detained by some of Susan Stothart own actions.

When I met with Cst. Jeff Lock on April 10, 2012 I wasn't aware that he
and Cst. John Lalonde had already spoken to Stephanie Baker about these ludicrous allegations. But I did mention that she lied about me breaking
the law and sending emails to Susan Stothart.

After some explaining to Cst. Jeff Lock as to what Stephanie Baker had said about me and my complaint about her to the Law Society of Upper Canada. Which I did say I would show him if he wanted to see it. It was obvious that Cst. Jeff Lock had spoken to a liar in Stephanie Baker and that she wouldn't be a reliable witness to anything they had planned for me and Cst. Jeff Lock never mentioned her name again.

Otherwise, I'm sure Cst. Jeff Lock would have charged me.

By Stephanie Baker lying to both Cst. Jeff Lock and Cst. John Lalonde
of the Sudbury Regional Police Services. Stephanie Baker is guilty of
Public Mischief contrary to Section 140 of the Criminal Code of Canada (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)Public Mischief.

Yet, even the Greater Sudbury Police Services know this and don't want
to do nothing. Because they don't care about my legal rights as I'm suing
them as we speak.

What do you think would have happened to me? Had I lied about anything
to the Police? I can bloody guarantee it that I would be arrested without fail.
So much for my guaranteed Equality Rights under the Canadian Charter.

Where it states:

" 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability."

Go figure Cst. Jeff Lock is currently being sued right now along with some of his fellow Police co-workers. Karma I say.

Even though I always told the World back in 2010-2011 that Stephanie Baker was more than friendly with the Sudbury Crown's office.

i.e dump trump.

I guess I wasn't that far off the mark as it's now fact and people can eat my words as I told you so. Could explain why Crown Attorney Susan Stothart never mentioned my email about Stephanie Baker to the police. Seeing the
are more than friends.

Because as of February 27, 2017 Stephanie Baker changed rolls from defence lawyer, to Assistant Crown Attorney with the Sudbury Crown Attorney's office.

Isn't it amazing that none of you probably knew any of this and you
actually thought that Stephanie Baker was a perfect little lawyer.

I've always wondered how some lawyers can get away with lying?

This image below is all that comes to me at this time.

If anyone of you have any concerns to what is written on this Web page.

Contact me as I have nothing to hide.